Chasing the dream… and finding out exactly what that means
More on AdWords Quality Scoring
On one of Digitalpoint’s forums, the new AdWords landing page quality score issue is being hotly debated. On this page, people are suggesting that the pricing policies used by Google AdWords may be illegal.
If you visit a shop to purchase something, you would not expect to be offered a price of £10 to buy a screwdriver that somebody else was able to purchase for 10p just because you look like a roughneck, yet this in effect is exactly what Google is doing in the digital domain. They’ve been doing this for some time, but the current situation with certain keywords attracting huge minimum bids has brought this issue into sharp relief.
It is illegal under certain circumstances to refuse to sell a product to a customer. However, Google is not refusing to sell a product. Google is, instead, quoting an uneconomical price for that product.
Google is refusing to give details of the system of quality scoring that they use, to prevent the system being manipulated by any other means than guesswork and experimentation. However, transparency in terms of pricing structure is simply not available, and this may fall foul of the law.
In a reply to somebody who was hit with a massive price hike in their minimum bid for certain keywords and logged a support request, it was confirmed that their landing page quality score had been adversely affected. When asked what they could do to improve their quality score, they were met with the following response:
“Unfortunately we cannot go into specifics about what changes you can make to get a better Quality Score other than to make sure that you are following the posted guidelines and that you consider the quality of search user’s experience when thinking about the advertising experience you are providing.”
David Thomas, The Affiliate Marketer
| Print article | This entry was posted by PostsFromTheAffiliateMarketer on 2006/07/14 at 11:15, and is filed under Front Page, Online Marketing. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 4 years ago
Hi Dave!
I thought of this analogy after reading what you wrote…
Zoning. If you look at search results as real estate.. virtual real estate, can not the governing body make rules as to who can build and where?…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoning
———————————————–
Zoning commonly includes regulation of the kinds of activities which will be acceptable on particular lots… the densities at which those activities can be performed… the height of buildings, the amount of space structures may occupy, the location of a building on the lot (setbacks), the proportions of the types of space on a lot (for example, how much landscaped space and how much paved space), and how much parking must be provided.
———————————
And if a business doesn’t conform, they won’t be allowed to build there or will have to pay more money…
Just offering another perspective. I think it’s more a matter of making the landscape pretty and making it more attractive so more people will use the area right? And Google uses the price hike to make it harder to be there… they could just deactivate it and now provide any opportunity to show.
If I have a website, I can allow and not allow certain websites to advertise on it. I may not have a complex algo to sort it out for me, but I can look at a site and say.. Nope. To much promoting and not enough value. Try again.
I’m not trying to defend Google and I feel bad for all that were affected in a bad way with this change in the algo, but I just had that thought and… thought it would be interesting to post..
Have a good one Dave! And keep up the good work.
[Reply]
about 4 years ago
Hi Matt! Thanks for your comment.
I wrote another post recently, Opportunity Knocks for AdWorders. I state in there that I believe there is an opportunity for people that want to develop a good website, because there will be less competition for those people. I’m in the middle of developing a website that should fall nicely within AdWords rules, and my marketing campaign should be consequently lower in price.
The trouble with Google is that whilst they can decide who gets to advertise on their service, they don’t provide any assistance to help you improve your website if it becomes necessary. This analogy is not perfect, but to me, it’s somewhat akin to somebody saying, “Right, I just changed the surface of the road. It’s much improved, but your bike will no longer be able to ride on the new surface. I’m not going to tell you how you can change your bike to suit the new road surface; that’s your own problem.”
All the best, Matt,
Dave
[Reply]